Brock Boland

Just a swell guy


07 Jun

A Sense of Accomplishment


I haven’t got much work-work done this weekend, except for a three-hour burst around midnight last night.

So far today, I’ve been focusing on little things: cleaning the apartment, scanning and shredding documents, doing laundry. Some days, I need this a lot more than I need to get the big stuff done, for my own sanity. I’ve been carrying about 20 items over from one daily todo list to the next, and it often feels like I’m not getting anything accomplished. On days like this, I need to spend a couple hours just doing the little stuff, to make some progress and knock some stuff off the list and get me started.

And for that reason, it’s been a pretty satisfying day already.


No Response Filed under: Productivity Tags: ,
12 Jan

Accepting Minimalism


I realize that I’ve donated and sold a whole mess of books and DVDs in the past few weeks, and add, “Update library app” to my to-do list.

And then I wonder, do I really need to maintain a list of the media I own? I’m trying to cut down on the clutter and get rid of things I don’t use much – is it worth the time to make sure I know what I have where and how many stars I gave it? Will that make my life any better?

I uninstalled the library app. Seems simpler that way.


Comments Off Filed under: Productivity
09 Jan

Non-productivity


I’m having three productivity issues these days.

  1. I need to organize my task list.  A lot more goes into my system than comes out.  I’m collecting all the things I need to get done, but I’ve done a crappy job of giving context-appropriate tags to those things and then taking advantage of them when I’ve got time to work on stuff.  The result is that I still keep a lot in my head – it’s all in my list, but I’m always thinking, “OK, I need to take care of that thing for work, and oh yeah, I was supposed to call so-and-so.”  I need to rely on the system, or it does me no good.
  2. I see everything as work.  Everything.  I have written before that this is the foundation of GTD, as far as I’m concerned, but I’m becoming obsessed.  Every spare moment, I feel like I should be Getting Something Done, and I’m constantly anxious about all the things on my list.  Much more on this later, I’m sure, but I’m trying to accept the fact that this stuff isn’t all going to get done this week, no matter how much I would like to have finished it last month.
  3. These two are exacerbating one another.  I haven’t organized my list because I have too much other stuff to do and haven’t made time.  I feel like I have a ton to do – and don’t handle it efficiently – because my list is kind of a mess.  It’s a vicious cycle.
I just want to take a couple weeks off and either give up on all of it or just finish it off.


Comments Off Filed under: Productivity
01 Jan

What If Women Cared About Productivity? | Productive Flourishing


An interesting read on Productive Flourishing: What If Women Cared About Productivity?

Please understand me here: I’m not coming from the position that women actually get life and what’s important and are the saviors of humankind. That would just replace one socially-indoctrinated form of sexism with another form of sexism. I am saying that having the perspectives of half of the population who are socialized to be concerned about different facets of the human condition would make our discussions of productivity, progress, and personal development more informed, interesting, and useful.


Comments Off Filed under: Productivity
14 Nov

Satisfaction


I would sum up Getting Things Done in two points:

  1. Write everything down.
  2. Everything is work.

The first is the most important for actually getting stuff done. As I’ve said before, if it doesn’t get written down, it doesn’t happen.

The second thing may not have actually been a point in the book, now that I think about it, but I’ve started seeing everything that needs to get done as a piece of work: I have to take out the trash and do laundry and book a hotel for that one weekend and make a shopping list and send an old friend an e-mail and research an API for a project I want to do. To me, things don’t fall into categories like household chores or personal projects – everything is a task that needs to be processed at some point. It’s not “work” in the traditional sense of the term, but they are things that need to be worked on.

I used to get so stressed about all the stuff on my todo list that wasn’t getting done, but now I realize that there will always be more stuff on my todo list. It all needs to get done, sooner or later. As long as I just keep chugging along, as long as I keep being productive, I will be content. I no longer get worried about all the things that need to get done, but I do get anxious if I feel like I’ve been slacking off and haven’t at least accomplished something every day.


4 Responses Filed under: Productivity Tags:
28 Sep

OmniFocus vs. Things


I’ve always been the kind of person that has two or three todo lists going at once. If it doesn’t get written down, it doesn’t happen. And if I lose a todo list, a whole bunch of things don’t happen.

This makes me the perfect candidate for any one of the GTD-style task management apps that have been bandied about lately. I’ve used both OmniFocus and Things quite extensively, and hopefully this will help other people figure out which one is right for them. But first, I should warn you: I am heavily biased towards Things. And also, Chris Bowler of The Weekly Review has said a lot of this before, so I hope he doesn’t mind that I’m going to drag him into this a few times.

OmniFocus

OmniFocus icon

Overview

I spent a few months using OmniFocus for task management and tried really hard to like it. It’s got a lot of horsepower – if you want a lot of customization and need to track a ton of items, OmniFocus might be good for you.

Usability

No seriously, it’s a workhorse. You can create projects. You can create lists of single-action tasks. You can create folder of projects. You can create contexts. You can create sub-contexts. And yes, you can create tasks, which can have due dates and notes and might repeat. And you can filter on all of that.

The way I see it, OmniFocus is like taking a 747 when, really, all I need is a kite. It’s got a ton of features and options and filters and what have you, and it’s really easy to waste a lot of time fiddling around with settings and just managing the app itself. As Chris Bowler wrote on The Weekly Review:

GTD, or whatever your ‘system’ of choice, are merely tools to accomplish that which you want to achieve. When the tool becomes the focus – the only focus – then we’ve missed the mark of what GTD was intended to improve. Namely, completing work and our ability to do so. Not to give us another distraction.

This was my biggest problem with OmniFocus – it was so easy to just keep tweaking my projects and contexts, and I never actually did anything. Just firing it up to figure out what I needed to work on started to feel like a chore.

Also, Command-N opens a new window, which makes sense in some apps, but not in this one. If you want to create a new task, the key combo is Ctrl-Command-N, and I could never get the hang of that.

Price

Pretty steep: $79.95.

iPhone App

At the high end for an iPhone app: $19.99

The sync is dodgy. The sneakypeek beta version of OmniFocus can sync its database to MobileMe (and other WebDav servers, if you have access to one), and the iPhone app can do the same. As far as I can tell, though, it syncs up it’s whole database at once. There were a lot of times that I would sync and it would find some conflict, so I would be forced to choose to use the server copy or the local copy – either way, some data gets lost. It also means that the sync takes a little while. The biggest issue I had was adding an item to my inbox on my old iPhone while I was out somewhere, then waiting for it to sync the whole database up to MobileMe over Edge. Factor in all the problems MobileMe was having a couple months ago, and it was not a pleasant experience.

They may have improved this process since I stopped using OmniFocus a month or two ago, but I haven’t tried it since.

Things

Things icon

Overview

If OmniFocus were a Microsoft product, Things would be the Apple equivalent. It’s simple, it’s easy to use, and it’s pretty to look at.

Things offers enough options to be really useful without being obnoxious. You can create projects, and you can create areas of responsibility. This took me a little while to get used to, because they aren’t exactly contexts, necessarily – they’re intended for things that don’t have an end-point like a project, but will include several tasks over time. For example, I’ve got areas for Home, Work, Blog Ideas, Wedding, and Project Ideas.

Things also allows you to tag items. It seems that most people use tags as they would contexts, but with more flexibility. For example, I might have a task to check with my parents about their plans to come visit. I can tag it ‘phone’, ‘dad’, and ‘mom’. If I have some time to make some calls, I might filter for the ‘phone’ tag and see I should call my parents about that visit. If mom or dad calls me for something and I’m in front of my computer (and let’s be honest, I will be), I can filter on their names to see what I need to talk to them about it (as I said earlier, if I don’t write it down, it doesn’t happen – so, yes, I put reminders to talk to my parents about stuff). I also discovered just a moment ago that you can also tag projects and areas of responsibility in addition to individual tasks.

Things has a couple things that OmniFocus doesn’t. For one, there’s a Today grouping. The idea is that you just mark items you want to finish today. They aren’t removed from the project or area of responsibility that they were in before, they just get a flag. It’s pretty handy to take a few minutes in the morning and flag the items you want to get done that day. The second thing is teammates. You can add people from your Address Book and assign tasks to them. Things doesn’t e-mail them or anything (er, I hope it doesn’t, anyway), but it adds a notation to the task that indicates someone else is working on it. Again, it stays in the project or area it was in, but you can easily see that you’re waiting on someone else to finish it. This feature is not complete yet, though.

Usability

It was like the first time I used a Mac after years on a PC, and discovered that things really didn’t need to be all that difficult. It’s a piece of cake. It’s looks like a Mac app, and Command-N creates a new task, like anyone in their right mind would expect it to. Tasks can be dragged from project to area of responsibility to Inbox to Today and most anywhere in between. There’s keyboard shortcuts for everything I’ve wanted them for, so far.

Tags can be associated with a character to quickly apply them to a task. If you select a task and hit the key that’s associated with a tag, it will be added to the item. For example, Things comes pre-loaded with some tags for priority: High, Medium, and Low are associated with 1, 2, and 3. I have w for ‘work’ and p for ‘phone’. If I select a task and hit w, it gets the ‘work’ tag – or I can hit w and then p and then 1, and it gets ‘work’, ‘phone’, and ‘High’.

The thing I didn’t mention before about tags is how easy it is to filter on them. If you’re looking at a list of tasks and any of them has a tag, those tags will appear at the top of the list, like so:

Things Tags

Clicking on of the tags will filter the list. Piece of cake.

Chris Bowler of The Weekly Review has some more comments about Things usability and design.

Price

Free, for now. It will be $49 when 1.0 is released, but you can get $10 off that by signing up for their newsletter.

iPhone App

$9.99.

The iPhone app is just as simple and pretty as the desktop app. Unfortunately, they’re still working on it, and it doesn’t have all the functionality: areas of responsibility and tags are both missing, but Cultured Code has said that these are both high priorities. It would be nice to have them, but I’m doing OK without.

On the upside, the sync works great. Things doesn’t sync through any third party service. You must connect both your desktop and your iPhone to the same wireless network, make sure Things is running on the desktop, and then start it on the iPhone. It sounds like an ordeal, but it’s really not: if I’m at home or work, both devices are already on the same network, and I have Things running on my laptop all the time anyway. And, if you’re the kind of person doing secrety things, you don’t have to worry about your task list going through a third party like MobileMe.

The sync only takes a second or two, and I’ve never had any conflicts or lost data. Once or twice, there has been an item that was marked complete on one device but got marked incomplete during the sync, but really, that’s about the least harmful issue I can think of.

My Verdict

Obviously, I’m a fan of Things. Like I said, OmniFocus is probably appropriate for a different kind of user. I’m the kind of person that needs a simple, easy system that won’t tempt me to waste time. Things has filled that role quite nicely – I’m getting a lot done these days, and thanks to the easy iPhone app, I never lose track of anything I need to get done.